The visual effects are easily the best to date as well, and of the year. The musical score from Hans Zimmer is, without a doubt, his best and most influential work to date, helping drive the film's bold and breath-taking vision (the church organ helped significantly). But the actor who stole the show in a few scenes (one in particular, when they're on an alien planet) was David Gyasi as Romilly, one of the astronauts aboard the Endurance, their spacecraft. The acting is top-notch, especially McConaughey, who gives (I would say) his most emotional performance yet. There are no words to express the epic journey Nolan takes us on in the film, but needless to say, it's tear-jerking and emotional throughout. Nolan set out to make his most personal and emotional film to date about love and time (time being a recurring theme throughout all of Nolan's films). Clarke's sci-fi epic wasn't to ponder the philosophical questions that accompanied the story, but to make art, and art is was, and is. Also, Stanley Kubrick's vision of Arthur C. The films are almost nothing alike, simply sharing small plot elements. To compare said film to '2001: A Space Odyssey' isn't just a disservice, but unnecessary. Interstellar is truly a sci-fi epic like no other. Before i get into it, though, i'll talk about Interstellar a bit. This is where i personally would have to disagree.

(This is both a review of the film, and an assertion of Christopher Nolan's filmmaking style) There have been many reviewers and critics alike that have high praise for the film (the visual effects, the acting, the music), but say how it's not Christopher Nolan's best directed film.

Interstellar hindi dubbed torrent